From 5022010f5d728820372839aff7eb461b112580d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my=20Zurcher?= <jeremy@asynk.ch>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:56:56 +0100
Subject: Engagement: use UnitList instead of Collection<Unit>

---
 core/src/ch/asynk/rustanddust/game/Engagement.java | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/core/src/ch/asynk/rustanddust/game/Engagement.java b/core/src/ch/asynk/rustanddust/game/Engagement.java
index 2d3bd24..c139f4b 100644
--- a/core/src/ch/asynk/rustanddust/game/Engagement.java
+++ b/core/src/ch/asynk/rustanddust/game/Engagement.java
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ import java.util.Random;
 import com.badlogic.gdx.utils.Pool;
 import com.badlogic.gdx.utils.Disposable;
 
-import ch.asynk.rustanddust.engine.util.Collection;
 import ch.asynk.rustanddust.engine.util.IterableArray;
 
 public class Engagement implements Disposable, Pool.Poolable
@@ -36,7 +35,7 @@ public class Engagement implements Disposable, Pool.Poolable
 
     public Unit attacker;
     public Unit defender;
-    public Collection<Unit> assists;
+    public UnitList assists;
     public boolean success;
     public int d1;
     public int d2;
@@ -52,7 +51,7 @@ public class Engagement implements Disposable, Pool.Poolable
 
     public Engagement()
     {
-        assists = new IterableArray<Unit>(10);
+        assists = new UnitList(10);
         reset();
     }
 
-- 
cgit v1.1-2-g2b99